After establishing that facts are useless, I have a lot of facts to show you.
Let us check the demographic history of the recent world. It's pretty interesting. I spent a while gathering up figures, mostly from Wikipedia, and some sporadic Googling. As far as I can tell the figures look pretty reliable.
I recently wrote about how 37% of births in France are Africans. How many people is that? Let's take a look at the number of live births in France.
1900 | 917,075 |
1910 | 828,140 |
1920 | 838,137 |
1930 | 754,020 |
1940 | 561,281 |
1950 | 862,310 |
1960 | 819,819 |
1970 | 850,381 |
1980 | 800,377 |
1990 | 762,407 |
2000 | 774,782 |
2010 | 802,224 |
2014 | 783,000 |
783,000 in 2014, of which 37.2 are Africans. That makes 291,276 Africans born in France in 2014, for 491,724 mostly white French. What does that mean in the long run though? I found a way of comparing birth rates to present populations, to get an idea. The average life expectancy in most of the develop world is around 80 years old. So just multiply the number of births by 80 to get the "projected population". Of course this assumes stable number of births over 80 years, which is a very stupid assumption. But it does serve our purposes to understand what 783,000 births in a year actually mean. What would it look like if France kept having 783,000 births every year? So let's just multiply the above chart per 80 to see what happens.
Projected | Population after 80 years |
1900 | 73,366,000 |
1910 | 66,251,200 |
1920 | 67,050,960 |
1930 | 60,321,600 |
1940 | 44,902,480 |
1950 | 68,984,800 |
1960 | 65,585,520 |
1970 | 68,030,480 |
1980 | 64,030,160 |
1990 | 60,992,560 |
2000 | 61,982,560 |
2010 | 64,177,920 |
2014 | 62,640,000 |
So in an imaginary world, in which 1900 birth rates had remained constant forever, France would have had a population of 73 million French. With 1950 birth rates, you get 68 million French. If 2014 birth rates were constant, in 80 years we'd have a population of 62 million. The catch is of those 62 million, 39 million are french, and 23 million are African. And of course it will only get worse.
Let's take a look at some other countries.
Germany | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | 1,944,139 | 155,531,120 |
1910 | 1,876,778 | 150,142,240 |
1920 | 932,929 | 74,634,320 |
1930 | 1,144,000 | 91,520,000 |
1940 | 1,402,258 | 112,180,640 |
1950 | 1,116,835 | 89,346,800 |
1960 | 1,261,614 | 100,929,120 |
1970 | 1,047,737 | 83,818,960 |
1980 | 865,789 | 69,263,120 |
1990 | 905,675 | 72,454,000 |
2000 | 766,999 | 61,359,920 |
2010 | 677,947 | 54,235,760 |
2014 | 714,966 | 57,197,280 |
The figures for 1900 are 1910 are somewhat misleading, as they include Poles, but still, Germany in 1900 was on truck to having a population of 155 million. As of 2014, Germany will shrink to 57 million, of which a big proportion will be Africans and Arabs (I'll call the Turks as Arabs for dramatic effect). The rising birth rate from 2010 hints that it's not Germans doing the breeding. So see again: a rising empire of 155 million (!) declining into a sad nation of perhaps 40-something million.
Spain | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | 627,848 | 50,227,840 |
1910 | 646,975 | 51,758,000 |
1920 | 623,339 | 49,867,120 |
1930 | 660,860 | 52,868,800 |
1940 | 631,285 | 50,502,800 |
1950 | 565,378 | 45,230,240 |
1960 | 663,375 | 53,070,000 |
1970 | 663,667 | 53,093,360 |
1980 | 571,018 | 45,681,440 |
1990 | 401,425 | 32,114,000 |
2000 | 397,632 | 31,810,560 |
2010 | 485,252 | 38,820,160 |
2014 | 426,303 | 34,104,240 |
Spain's case isn't as dramatic as Germany, but still pretty bleak. On track for 53 million s late as 1970, not they'll be lucky to get to 30 million.
Netherlands | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | 162,611 | 13,008,880 |
1910 | 170,766 | 13,661,280 |
1920 | 192,987 | 15,438,960 |
1930 | 182,310 | 14,584,800 |
1940 | 184,846 | 14,787,680 |
1950 | 229,718 | 18,377,440 |
1960 | 239,128 | 19,130,240 |
1970 | 238,912 | 19,112,960 |
1980 | 181,294 | 14,503,520 |
1990 | 197,965 | 15,837,200 |
2000 | 206,619 | 16,529,520 |
2010 | 184,397 | 14,751,760 |
2014 | 174,507 | 13,960,560 |
The Netherlands, on track for 19 million by 1970, now perhaps half that.
United Kingdom | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | 1,091,000 | 87,280,000 |
1910 | 975,000 | 78,000,000 |
1920 | 824,000 | 65,920,000 |
1930 | 793,000 | 63,440,000 |
1940 | 793,000 | 63,440,000 |
1950 | 962,000 | 76,960,000 |
1960 | 918,286 | 73,462,880 |
1970 | 903,907 | 72,312,560 |
1980 | 753,708 | 60,296,640 |
1990 | 798,612 | 63,888,960 |
2000 | 679,029 | 54,322,320 |
2010 | 807,271 | 64,581,680 |
2014 | 776,400 | 62,112,000 |
Damn, the Brits were crazy back in 1900. 87 million! No wonder they left to Australia and beyond. However the English race won't blight the Earth any longer, as it's barely projected to number 40 million by 2094, while South Asians and Africans take their place. I do think the English could thrive under Islam though. The English have always been a religious people. And while alcohol might be tough to forsake, it's probably for their own good. And they'd be free to bugger boys with abandon. That more than compensates for the prohibition of beer. So cheers for Londonistan.
Poland | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | 890,400 | 71,232,000 |
1930 | 1,022,811 | 81,824,880 |
1940 | 849,873 | 67,989,840 |
1950 | 763,108 | 61,048,640 |
1960 | 669,485 | 53,558,800 |
1970 | 545,973 | 43,677,840 |
1980 | 692,798 | 55,423,840 |
1990 | 545,817 | 43,665,360 |
2000 | 378,348 | 30,267,840 |
2010 | 413,300 | 33,064,000 |
2014 | 375,160 | 30,012,800 |
No figures for Poland before WW1, but wow, 1930 Poles were breeding like rabbits. 81 million projected! Hitler and Stalin took care of that, and the Cathedral gave the final blow. Poles will be lucky to be 30 million people at this rate. But hey, at least they're not invaded by foreigners. Yet.
Finland | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | 86,339 | 6,907,120 |
1910 | 92,984 | 7,438,720 |
1920 | 84,714 | 6,777,120 |
1930 | 75,236 | 6,018,880 |
1940 | 65,849 | 5,267,920 |
1950 | 98,065 | 7,845,200 |
1960 | 82,129 | 6,570,320 |
1970 | 64,559 | 5,164,720 |
1980 | 63,064 | 5,045,120 |
1990 | 65,549 | 5,243,920 |
2000 | 56,742 | 4,539,360 |
2010 | 60,980 | 4,878,400 |
2014 | 57,232 | 4,578,560 |
Finland had its peak in 1910, with 7.4 million projected. Now it's down to 4.5 million. But it's all perhaps for the best. It's a nasty piece of real estate they got up there. One wonders how the hell did they plan to feed 7 million Finns. Unfortunately Finland is now starting to bringing Muslims into the Arctic, so they'll have to deal with that. The Arabs may not breed that much up there. It's cold and dark, and they don't drink. Finns should make a documentary about miserable Arabs in the Arctic Winter, just for fun.
Hungary | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | 249,000 | 19,920,000 |
1930 | 220,000 | 17,600,000 |
1940 | 185,562 | 14,844,960 |
1950 | 195,567 | 15,645,360 |
1960 | 146,461 | 11,716,880 |
1970 | 151,819 | 12,145,520 |
1980 | 148,673 | 11,893,840 |
1990 | 125,679 | 10,054,320 |
2000 | 97,597 | 7,807,760 |
2010 | 90,335 | 7,226,800 |
2014 | 91,150 | 7,292,000 |
The same as Poland, Hungary went crazy after WW1. All the wars and craziness of independence must have made them very optimistic about the future. Or maybe it was an Afghan style "gotta breed some more to raise soldiers to kill our enemies". Again Communism took care of that, and US overlordship gave the final blow. Hungary today has a projected population of almost 1/3 of its 1920 peak.
Croatia | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | 97,000 | 7,760,000 |
1910 | 99,000 | 7,920,000 |
1920 | - | |
1930 | - | |
1940 | - | |
1950 | 95,560 | 7,644,800 |
1960 | 76,156 | 6,092,480 |
1970 | 61,103 | 4,888,240 |
1980 | 68,220 | 5,457,600 |
1990 | 55,409 | 4,432,720 |
2000 | 43,746 | 3,499,680 |
2010 | 43,361 | 3,468,880 |
2014 | 39,566 | 3,165,280 |
Croatia follows the Eastern European pattern. It's no wonder the Habsburg empire was having so much trouble. The minorities were breeding so much! They were fortunate to lose to the Communists so that they all lost interest in human existence. Croatians were busy fighting for independence from Serbians, but apparently haven't realized that for Croatia to exist it needs some Croatians. Guess the saying it's true, the only worse thing than not getting what you want, is getting what you want.
Let's now venture outside Europe.
USA | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | - | |
1930 | 2,377,000 | 190,160,000 |
1940 | 2,559,000 | 204,720,000 |
1950 | 3,632,000 | 290,560,000 |
1960 | 4,257,000 | 340,560,000 |
1970 | 3,731,386 | 298,510,880 |
1980 | 3,612,258 | 288,980,640 |
1990 | 4,158,212 | 332,656,960 |
2000 | 4,058,814 | 324,705,120 |
2010 | 3,999,386 | 319,950,880 |
2014 | 3,985,924 | 318,873,920 |
If I'm not mistaken the US didn't get much immigration from 1925 to 1965, so the increase in births is staggering. By 1960 the projected population was 340 million. And that was 90% white. Alas by now white births are half the total, so about 2 million, which gives 160 million whites in 80 years.
Japan | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | 1,470,000 | 117,600,000 |
1910 | 1,782,000 | 142,560,000 |
1920 | 2,105,000 | 168,400,000 |
1930 | 2,085,000 | 166,800,000 |
1940 | 2,100,164 | 168,013,120 |
1950 | 2,337,507 | 187,000,560 |
1960 | 1,627,939 | 130,235,120 |
1970 | 1,955,277 | 156,422,160 |
1980 | 1,576,889 | 126,151,120 |
1990 | 1,221,585 | 97,726,800 |
2000 | 1,194,000 | 95,520,000 |
2010 | 1,083,000 | 86,640,000 |
2014 | 1,001,000 | 80,080,000 |
Japan today is the oldest country on Earth, but the most important part is how fast the demographic transition was. In 1950 there were 2.3 million Japanese being born. That projects a population of 187 million! Well that didn't happen. Japan is barely producing 1 million babies per year, which adds nicely to 80 million. Not bad, but of course it may get worse before it gets better. But as long as they keep the borders closed it'll be a nice place.
Russia | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | - | |
1930 | 4,412,000 | 352,960,000 |
1940 | 3,814,000 | 305,120,000 |
1950 | 2,859,000 | 228,720,000 |
1960 | 2,662,135 | 212,970,800 |
1970 | 1,903,713 | 152,297,040 |
1980 | 2,202,779 | 176,222,320 |
1990 | 1,988,858 | 159,108,640 |
2000 | 1,266,800 | 101,344,000 |
2010 | 1,788,948 | 143,115,840 |
2014 | 1,947,301 | 155,784,080 |
Say what you will about Stalin but his subjects in 1930 were breeding like champs. 4.4 million births! That would add up to 350 million Russians. Which is sorta inaccurate, as the Russian life expectancy doesn't get to 80 years, not by a mile, but still. Note also the very impressive recovery since 2000. Russia seems to be doing well at continuing to be Russia. And no I won't accept that it's all the Caucasian and Turkic Muslims doing all the breeding unless you give me their birth data.
China | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | - | |
1930 | - | |
1940 | - | |
1950 | 20,232,000 | 1,618,560,000 |
1960 | 13,915,000 | 1,113,200,000 |
1970 | 27,356,000 | 2,188,480,000 |
1980 | 17,868,000 | 1,429,440,000 |
1990 | 23,910,000 | 1,912,800,000 |
2000 | 17,710,000 | 1,416,800,000 |
2010 | 15,920,000 | 1,273,600,000 |
2014 | 16,870,000 | 1,349,600,000 |
Dumb people tend to ask why China did something so evil as the One Child Policy. Well by 1990 China was projected to have 1,9 billion people. And now it doesn't. There's still almost 17 million Chinese being born every year, so they're doing ok. But good for Deng.
India | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | - | |
1930 | - | |
1940 | - | |
1950 | 16,832,000 | 1,346,560,000 |
1960 | 19,086,000 | 1,526,880,000 |
1970 | 25,577,000 | 2,046,160,000 |
1980 | 27,566,000 | 2,205,280,000 |
1990 | 26,388,000 | 2,111,040,000 |
2000 | 27,191,000 | 2,175,280,000 |
2010 | 27,064,000 | 2,165,120,000 |
2014 | 27,379,500 | 2,190,360,000 |
While China dodged the bullet, India didn't manage to. It took the bullet squarely into their heads. Look at those figures. 27 million Indians are being born every year. Let that sink into your head for a while. Twenty Seven Million. Every Year. Now almost half of India is malnourished as it is, imagine when this kids grow up. No way India is going to raise feed 2 billion people. The famines are going to be something to behold. I wonder what Raspail thinks of these figures.
Iraq | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | - | |
1930 | - | |
1940 | - | |
1950 | 327,000 | 26,160,000 |
1960 | 343,000 | 27,440,000 |
1970 | 475,000 | 38,000,000 |
1980 | 571,000 | 45,680,000 |
1990 | 719,000 | 57,520,000 |
2000 | 960,000 | 76,800,000 |
2010 | 1,079,000 | 86,320,000 |
2014 | - |
While even India is keeping the births more or less stagnant, take a look at this. Iraq's births have tripled in 60 years. Tripled. At this rate there'd be 86 million Iraqis on earth. The Tigris and Eufrates are nice but they can't feed 86 million people. I doubt they carry enough water for 86 million Arabs to drink. Where will these people go?
Egypt | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | - | |
1930 | - | |
1940 | 697,700 | 55,816,000 |
1950 | 904,941 | 72,395,280 |
1960 | 1,113,888 | 89,111,040 |
1970 | 1,161,539 | 92,923,120 |
1980 | 1,569,247 | 125,539,760 |
1990 | 1,687,000 | 134,960,000 |
2000 | 1,751,854 | 140,148,320 |
2010 | 2,261,409 | 180,912,720 |
2014 | 2,720,495 | 217,639,600 |
Well the same place the Egyptians are going to go. Egypt is insane. 2.7 million births last year. At this rate there'll be 217 million Egyptians. They're going to eat the pyramids. If the Muslim Brotherhood doesn't blow them up before they do.
Nigeria | Births | Births x 80 |
1900 | - | |
1910 | - | |
1920 | - | |
1930 | - | |
1940 | - | |
1950 | 1,821,000 | 145,680,000 |
1960 | 2,202,000 | 176,160,000 |
1970 | 2,081,000 | 166,480,000 |
1980 | 3,642,000 | 291,360,000 |
1990 | 4,446,000 | 355,680,000 |
2000 | 5,606,000 | 448,480,000 |
2010 | 7,000,000 | 560,000,000 |
2014 | - |
I won't comment on this one. 560 million Nigerians. Hahahaha. Haha. Ha...
What's most funny is when you compare all these figures to the actual population figures, past and present.
India | Nigeria | Iraq | Egypt | |||
Actual 1900 | 280,912,000 | 16,000,000 | 2,060,000 | 8,000,000 | ||
Actual 1950 | 357,561,000 | 29,790,000 | 5,158,000 | 21,834,000 | ||
Actual 2015 | 1,252,000,000 | 173,600,000 | 36,632,000 | 88,800,000 | ||
Projected 2094 | 2,190,360,000 | 560,000,000 | 86,320,000 | 217,639,600 |
India had 280 million people in 1900. At this rate it will have 2.2 billion.
Nigeria had 16 million people (by British count) in 1900. At this rate it will have 560 million.
Iraq had 2 million people in 1900. 2 million! At this rate it will have 43 times as much.
Egypt had 8 million. Damn 1900 Egypt must have been a beautiful place. Now it has 88 million, 10 times as more, and at this rate it will have 217 million.
None of this will happen, of course. Something has to give. There is not enough food to feed all those Arabs, Indians and Africans. And I'm not going to feed them. I'm also quite positive that the future brown majorities in France, Germany and England are not going to feed them either. Oh, it's gonna be fun. Utterly miserable. But fun.
God, we are so fucked.
“None of this will happen, of course. Something has to give. There is not enough food to feed all those Arabs, Indians and Africans. And I’m not going to feed them. I’m also quite positive that the future brown majorities in France, Germany and England are not going to feed them either. Oh, it’s gonna be fun. Utterly miserable. But fun.”
Not to worry mang, the Cathedral's got shit [i.e. ecological overshoot, see William R. Catton's 'Overshoot' and 'Bottleneck'] covered. You see, in the existing global hierarchy, “whitey” is still at the very pinnacle of the food-chain, hence there's plenty of elbow room for “re-equilibration”. This is where Robin Hood'esque projects come into play to make things right in a world painfully scarred by memories of centuries-long alien colonial/imperial domination. Think of climate-change, multikulti/mass-immigration, affirmative action, the deconstruction of “whiteness” and a huuuuge array of other concessions, as forms of cryptoreparation—to satisfy the global surge in the quest for personal dignity, cultural respect and economic opportunity.
The trick is to move somewhere very fucking cold and underpopulated, then befriend some Inuit...and live happily ever after.
Not to mention, universal access to the interwebz, radio and teevee, creates a shared envy of seeing “whitey” precariously perched atop of the food-chain—it is the youngin's of the third world that are particularly resentful and restless.
Longer term, it should make any thinking person wonder who the most probable target of soft followed by eventual hard-genocide will be?
Funnily enough I read this from the Guardian today:
http://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/nov/18/why-south-african-students-have-turned-on-their-parents-generation
Which illustrates your genocide point well and the economic crisis (probably requiring an IMF bailout) on the horizons illustrates your food point.
Interesting article, but with all the usual dreariness: twenty years after the end of apartheid, Blacks are pissed and YT must pay and be written out of history. Racial consciousness goes to the bone.
Yeah, just looking at the copycat protests at Mizzou, Yale and elsewhere, South Africa might provide a pretty good glimpse—a fasttracked proxy-microcosm of the West at large.
It will be a great tragedy, or the largest quantity of human death and suffering. ever. It may be nearer to the "end times" from a religious standpoint.
Do what the Mormons (historically) did, and keep a year or so supply of food for you and your loved ones. Also, don't tell anyone.
As angry as so many of us were at the so-called "Migrant Crisis" in 2015, these numbers show that "it *is* inevitable" -- If not now, then later, maybe even much later, but in some scenario or other, it is inevitable. The leftwing drones are correct...Unless we seize control of our own destiny again. Revivalism is yet possible.
On the small good news front, the USA has recovered to 54% of births being White, from reportedly perhaps being hitting 49.9% for the first time a few years back.
See the graph at Total Fertility Rates by Race in the USA, 1980-2013. U.S. Whites are no longer being vastly outbred by Nonwhites in relative terms.
It's all good, we'll just use crispr to make new Super crops to feed all the people.
3 pingbacks