The Coming Globalish Far-Right Elite

Germany’s “far-right” AfD chooses a Lesbian who has worked 6 years in China and speaks “fluent” Mandarin as co-leader.

maxresdefault

Maybe I should get into politics myself?

She doesn’t look like a crazy dyke; looks pretty good actually. So I’m guessing she went lesbian in China, making virtue out of necessity. It’s harsh out there for white women in Asia. Very harsh.

Leave a comment ?

62 Comments.

  1. The Coming Globalish Far-Right Elite | @the_arv - pingback on May 3, 2017 at 1:40 pm
  2. The Coming Globalish Far-Right Elite | @the_arv - pingback on May 3, 2017 at 1:40 pm
  3. “Maybe I should get into politics myself?”

    No better place to get in than on the ground floor. Aim for Finance Minister, if not PM.

  4. “Maybe I should get into politics myself?”

    No better place to get in than on the ground floor. Aim for Finance Minister, if not PM.

  5. Rejuvenating.

    I think it’s an adjective we can agree on, or can not we.

    • Why harsh?

      You state something like “It’s harsh out there for white women in Asia. Very harsh” proving no explanation, lol…

      • Because they’re women.

        If you don’t get it you gotta get yourself to Roissy’s and spent 6 months there before coming back.

        • No, he (or she better yet) needs to actually get whatever-itself to rural China and spend 6 months before coming back.

        • I suspect you mean that she will mostly find low T beta men in Asia, especially in these white collar circles – but “rough” is not the best way to describe that experience, more like “bored”, “underwhelmed” or “untingled”.

          • I’m sure she felt the lack of male attention as very very harsh on her self esteem.

          • So that’s what you meant. If I didn’t know she was a *female homosexual*, I’d think she would attract almost any man, once he gets some of that corporate-skirt business off (inside photo much more Playboy-ready, even though has troubled-violent-dyke-look too.) I thought she wouldn’t want Chinese men herself. But either way, maybe she’s saying sex isn’t important for her, or lesbianism is ‘more sensitive’, cf. Joan Didion on the 1st Wave Feminists. Because she’s surely loaded, and could have afforded, courtesy of being Goldman Sachs bitch, ‘sexual tourism’, go back to Europe all the time, and if she’s in the German Right now, she could get all the German sausage she had before defecting. She had a German adolescence and plenty of time there in her 20s, I’d think, meaning she would have never had to give her German bfs.

            I guess this is just different fantasies, and a face like that, replete with those gnome ears I’ve only seen on German and Swiss, will definitely stimulate stories in your head. That’s why I still think she was always a depraved lesbian, because now that she’s back in Germany, she’s stayed lesbian, and has a nerve getting away with it. Surely she was not deflowered by vicious Chinese lesbians, so she could go back to Germany and change back to guys who are definitely going to want her. She looks like one of the best from Ingmar Bergman, viz., Ingrid Thulin, from ‘Wild Strawberries’ and ‘Cries and Whispers’. Without the lesbianism, she’s a freakin’ TEN.

          • ‘meaning she would never have to GIVE UP her German bfs’. I think it’s hard to imagine her pursuing Chinese males, although I see some of your point.

  6. Rejuvenating.

    I think it’s an adjective we can agree on, or can not we.

    • Why harsh?

      You state something like “It’s harsh out there for white women in Asia. Very harsh” proving no explanation, lol…

      • Because they’re women.

        If you don’t get it you gotta get yourself to Roissy’s and spent 6 months there before coming back.

        • No, he (or she better yet) needs to actually get whatever-itself to rural China and spend 6 months before coming back.

        • I suspect you mean that she will mostly find low T beta men in Asia, especially in these white collar circles – but “rough” is not the best way to describe that experience, more like “bored”, “underwhelmed” or “untingled”.

          • I’m sure she felt the lack of male attention as very very harsh on her self esteem.

          • So that’s what you meant. If I didn’t know she was a *female homosexual*, I’d think she would attract almost any man, once he gets some of that corporate-skirt business off (inside photo much more Playboy-ready, even though has troubled-violent-dyke-look too.) I thought she wouldn’t want Chinese men herself. But either way, maybe she’s saying sex isn’t important for her, or lesbianism is ‘more sensitive’, cf. Joan Didion on the 1st Wave Feminists. Because she’s surely loaded, and could have afforded, courtesy of being Goldman Sachs bitch, ‘sexual tourism’, go back to Europe all the time, and if she’s in the German Right now, she could get all the German sausage she had before defecting. She had a German adolescence and plenty of time there in her 20s, I’d think, meaning she would have never had to give her German bfs.

            I guess this is just different fantasies, and a face like that, replete with those gnome ears I’ve only seen on German and Swiss, will definitely stimulate stories in your head. That’s why I still think she was always a depraved lesbian, because now that she’s back in Germany, she’s stayed lesbian, and has a nerve getting away with it. Surely she was not deflowered by vicious Chinese lesbians, so she could go back to Germany and change back to guys who are definitely going to want her. She looks like one of the best from Ingmar Bergman, viz., Ingrid Thulin, from ‘Wild Strawberries’ and ‘Cries and Whispers’. Without the lesbianism, she’s a freakin’ TEN.

          • ‘meaning she would never have to GIVE UP her German bfs’. I think it’s hard to imagine her pursuing Chinese males, although I see some of your point.

  7. The Coming Globalish Far-Right Elite | Reaction Times - pingback on May 3, 2017 at 5:25 pm
  8. The Coming Globalish Far-Right Elite | Reaction Times - pingback on May 3, 2017 at 5:25 pm
  9. Beautiful lips in this one, but looks like a handsome man crossed with Naomi Klein. I’m so sick of the trendy lesbianism (and they capitalize it too), these ‘good-faced’ ones are doing it like crazy, saw that shit movie with Kristen Stewart the other day, she’s ‘been dating [supermodel] since late 2016’ (2 others before that), and probably was paedophiled in 2004 when played daughter of dyke Jodi Foster. Does indeed ‘look pretty good’, but disagree otherwise: She does look like a fuckin crazy dyke, and she’d be total bitch-on-wheels, and not in a good way like Le Pen, who just needs a little hips reduction, but actually looks like a feminine woman in the face, has even a little resemblance to Deneuve. Agree with JB she needs at least 6 months in rural China, that way she’ll be as dingy-looking as Ms. Stewart in ‘personal shopper’. Other pic has this criminal looking ‘fresh from the bath’. I bet she’s tall like that Nazi Princess Michael, too–total dom, but latter not dyke, just whore.

  10. Beautiful lips in this one, but looks like a handsome man crossed with Naomi Klein. I’m so sick of the trendy lesbianism (and they capitalize it too), these ‘good-faced’ ones are doing it like crazy, saw that shit movie with Kristen Stewart the other day, she’s ‘been dating [supermodel] since late 2016’ (2 others before that), and probably was paedophiled in 2004 when played daughter of dyke Jodi Foster. Does indeed ‘look pretty good’, but disagree otherwise: She does look like a fuckin crazy dyke, and she’d be total bitch-on-wheels, and not in a good way like Le Pen, who just needs a little hips reduction, but actually looks like a feminine woman in the face, has even a little resemblance to Deneuve. Agree with JB she needs at least 6 months in rural China, that way she’ll be as dingy-looking as Ms. Stewart in ‘personal shopper’. Other pic has this criminal looking ‘fresh from the bath’. I bet she’s tall like that Nazi Princess Michael, too–total dom, but latter not dyke, just whore.

  11. Maybe I should get into politics myself?

    I would vote for you. (But then that’s why I read your blog, right?)

    But you said “get into politics,” didn’t you? You did not say, “run for office in a democratic election.” Thus, if lucky, I may not have to vote for you.

    I had not heard of the woman, Weidel. Interesting. I know no stereotype to which to fit her. Now that you’ve introduced her, I can pay a bit of attention to see what develops.

    So, is “fluent” Mandarin the red pill?

  12. Maybe I should get into politics myself?

    I would vote for you. (But then that’s why I read your blog, right?)

    But you said “get into politics,” didn’t you? You did not say, “run for office in a democratic election.” Thus, if lucky, I may not have to vote for you.

    I had not heard of the woman, Weidel. Interesting. I know no stereotype to which to fit her. Now that you’ve introduced her, I can pay a bit of attention to see what develops.

    So, is “fluent” Mandarin the red pill?

  13. Inquiring Mind

    Isn’t this “orientation” of a German woman technocrat a trope/stereotype/thing?

    Maybe I am thinking of the no-nonsense German woman, with no time for foreplay and who urges her lover with “Schnell, bitte!” and “Bist du fertig?”

    • She just looks like an unforgiving feminist. I don’t believe she became a *Lesbian* in China. She’s been like that all her life. Groomed *Lesbians* are recent phenomena.

      • Lesbians because of hypergamy gone wild though are as old as sin. And in China there’s a sore lack of suitable men for a high T German Blondie.

        • lol yes. It’s possible she misses the grandsons of the SS, but that’s still a curious way of making ‘virtue’ out of necessity (granted the necessity.)

  14. Inquiring Mind

    Isn’t this “orientation” of a German woman technocrat a trope/stereotype/thing?

    Maybe I am thinking of the no-nonsense German woman, with no time for foreplay and who urges her lover with “Schnell, bitte!” and “Bist du fertig?”

    • She just looks like an unforgiving feminist. I don’t believe she became a *Lesbian* in China. She’s been like that all her life. Groomed *Lesbians* are recent phenomena.

      • Lesbians because of hypergamy gone wild though are as old as sin. And in China there’s a sore lack of suitable men for a high T German Blondie.

        • lol yes. It’s possible she misses the grandsons of the SS, but that’s still a curious way of making ‘virtue’ out of necessity (granted the necessity.)

  15. How does one reconcile being gay and joining AfD? That’s easy. For gays, the fewer Muslims in your country, the better. Nydwracu’s been saying the same thing for a while.

  16. How does one reconcile being gay and joining AfD? That’s easy. For gays, the fewer Muslims in your country, the better. Nydwracu’s been saying the same thing for a while.

  17. Yet another woman. The amount of women in european politics is a sign of its power decline.

    • Probably, the amount of comments along such lines is a sign of the “Alt-Right” status at present, and sadly it might be an harbinger of its future.

      Nobody and nothing can be forced to evolve, however.

      I am posting this comment because I wanted to share a writing by David Cole on Taki’s, Crime against Nature.

      It says something regarding power and addiction to power that I have noticed on my own, but wouldn’t be as good at saying.

      Power and addiction to power (and the close-mindedness they thrive on/depend on/nourish) are my favorite question, since independence of mind and truth-seeking are my main features.

      I have observer (very first-hand) for example that the intellectual bounds of any organization have to not to cross the bigwigs’/huge wig’s intellectual limits.
      If you are below in the power hierarchy and do not conceal your wider horizons, you incur the wrath of offended vanity… (like all deep feelings in normal humans, the wrath’s true origin will be unknown to its holder; the rational brain will manufacture false “reasons” to serve as grounds for said wrath. Knowing the origins of such wrath would only further the wounds of vanity; not knowing them is needful).

      The free can not stay in group.

      • If you want to assess the horizons of someone’s mind, just throw them novel ideas, push them to change their standpoint, and see how quickly, and how nervously, they have recourse to mental shields like “this is nonsense”, “this is insane” and the thousand analogous ones (it’s telling how many of such shield-words close-mindedness and power have coined over the millennia).

        Now, this attitude can have different origins. As hinted at afore, it can come from drive-for-power or drive-for-comfort. Some people are equipped to handle ideas and free-ranging thinking, but an open world of ideas is a realm were they won’t hold kingdom: unappealing if not appalling. They define a circle within which they feel they are kings, and call the outside “nonsense”. They are the chiefs: in act or in potency it has no weight here. Chiefs in act are equipped to handle ideas, but their big ego and big will-to-power prevent them from having an open perspective on reality.
        They want to control reality; and in order to control it, you have to construct one fearfully simpler than it is (or even: it looks).

        Then there are the masses: these people can be of any IQ: IQ has little to nothing to do with the issue at hand. They can’t handle ideas. They ought borrow them.
        (Unconsciously knowing they can not handle thinking) they borrow ideas from established authorities. What establishes authorities is the social power hierarchy. The Guardian has more of it then The Daily Mail. The Daily Mail has more of it than this blog here.

        Few things normal humans fear as freedom. Freedom loads you with having to decide on… everything. Too many can not. Humans are a social species, hard-wired to follow.
        What physically happens to the ant or bee who’s lost the tracks of his/her pack, happens to normal humans mentally if they were parted from the BBC, Guardian, or established sociology, or you name it (the list is endless).

        Being free without the equipment to exercise freedom can be a lot alike to having no ground beneath one’s feet. To hover in a void. I can’t understand them, but, at long last, I am starting to understand them.

        You write something on a site, and they will judge whether or not it’s “OK” based on “nobody writes it like this” or “You see it written like this a lot”.

        There can be no individuality, thus excellency, in group.
        Even if the bigwigs had open minds, they’d be forced to pretend they haven’t in order to have the followers like them.

        There can be no independence, thus genuine thinking, in group. Groups are for functioning, conquering, winning, gaining and keeping power.
        No place for truth, inquiry and intelligence in its genuine meaning.

        Look at what has happened with culture (which is expressed by the humanities and arts, primarily) since the emphasis on the collective, the group, began.

        Sorry for the “wall of text”.

    • _Western_ European. There is a distinct lack of important female politicians in V4, for example.

  18. Yet another woman. The amount of women in european politics is a sign of its power decline.

    • Probably, the amount of comments along such lines is a sign of the “Alt-Right” status at present, and sadly it might be an harbinger of its future.

      Nobody and nothing can be forced to evolve, however.

      I am posting this comment because I wanted to share a writing by David Cole on Taki’s, Crime against Nature.

      It says something regarding power and addiction to power that I have noticed on my own, but wouldn’t be as good at saying.

      Power and addiction to power (and the close-mindedness they thrive on/depend on/nourish) are my favorite question, since independence of mind and truth-seeking are my main features.

      I have observer (very first-hand) for example that the intellectual bounds of any organization have to not to cross the bigwigs’/huge wig’s intellectual limits.
      If you are below in the power hierarchy and do not conceal your wider horizons, you incur the wrath of offended vanity… (like all deep feelings in normal humans, the wrath’s true origin will be unknown to its holder; the rational brain will manufacture false “reasons” to serve as grounds for said wrath. Knowing the origins of such wrath would only further the wounds of vanity; not knowing them is needful).

      The free can not stay in group.

      • If you want to assess the horizons of someone’s mind, just throw them novel ideas, push them to change their standpoint, and see how quickly, and how nervously, they have recourse to mental shields like “this is nonsense”, “this is insane” and the thousand analogous ones (it’s telling how many of such shield-words close-mindedness and power have coined over the millennia).

        Now, this attitude can have different origins. As hinted at afore, it can come from drive-for-power or drive-for-comfort. Some people are equipped to handle ideas and free-ranging thinking, but an open world of ideas is a realm were they won’t hold kingdom: unappealing if not appalling. They define a circle within which they feel they are kings, and call the outside “nonsense”. They are the chiefs: in act or in potency it has no weight here. Chiefs in act are equipped to handle ideas, but their big ego and big will-to-power prevent them from having an open perspective on reality.
        They want to control reality; and in order to control it, you have to construct one fearfully simpler than it is (or even: it looks).

        Then there are the masses: these people can be of any IQ: IQ has little to nothing to do with the issue at hand. They can’t handle ideas. They ought borrow them.
        (Unconsciously knowing they can not handle thinking) they borrow ideas from established authorities. What establishes authorities is the social power hierarchy. The Guardian has more of it then The Daily Mail. The Daily Mail has more of it than this blog here.

        Few things normal humans fear as freedom. Freedom loads you with having to decide on… everything. Too many can not. Humans are a social species, hard-wired to follow.
        What physically happens to the ant or bee who’s lost the tracks of his/her pack, happens to normal humans mentally if they were parted from the BBC, Guardian, or established sociology, or you name it (the list is endless).

        Being free without the equipment to exercise freedom can be a lot alike to having no ground beneath one’s feet. To hover in a void. I can’t understand them, but, at long last, I am starting to understand them.

        You write something on a site, and they will judge whether or not it’s “OK” based on “nobody writes it like this” or “You see it written like this a lot”.

        There can be no individuality, thus excellency, in group.
        Even if the bigwigs had open minds, they’d be forced to pretend they haven’t in order to have the followers like them.

        There can be no independence, thus genuine thinking, in group. Groups are for functioning, conquering, winning, gaining and keeping power.
        No place for truth, inquiry and intelligence in its genuine meaning.

        Look at what has happened with culture (which is expressed by the humanities and arts, primarily) since the emphasis on the collective, the group, began.

        Sorry for the “wall of text”.

    • _Western_ European. There is a distinct lack of important female politicians in V4, for example.

  19. Guy lays out his case on why East Asia won’t be able to maintain civilization when the West falls:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuglFs6PdSI

  20. Guy lays out his case on why East Asia won’t be able to maintain civilization when the West falls:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuglFs6PdSI

Leave a Comment


NOTE - You can use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Trackbacks and Pingbacks: